Supercalafragilisticexpialodocious

Jun 17, 2005

Alas, I can only claim credit for one.

"Silly. Under pressure easily rewriting. Can a linguist always find really awesomely good answers. Like I said, this is clearly easy. X-rays prove I am legal, or does odd capricious intent offer, unctuously, supercalifragilisticexpialodocious?"

"Sure. Understated performance enhances reception—can anyone like it for really abstruse guise? I like it, shouldn't typically indecent cliques engage, xenophilically perhaps, in a like-oriented domain? Or can I offer unctuous sperm?"

"Say, urban planners, easy rewards can attract lazy investors. Fairly reluctant artists get incentives, like individualistic stylish townhouses. I can't escape 'Xerxes,' people! It's always left out, dangling, on call, inside our unctuous supercalifragilisticexpialodiciouses."

"Surely, under pressure everything really can align lovingly if fragments return and garner interesting lessons. Is such time innocent? 'Cause everyone's xenodocheionology places immense altruism lower on doors (only cast in other styles)."

Comments

on 2005-06-18 15:11:38.0, Matt Weiner commented:

"...other urban styles."

[permalink]


and, further, on 2005-06-20 7:17:00.0, Joe Drymala commented:

There's an important quote in the New Yorker this week:

"The woods have always been full of Wolfsons..."

So very true.

[permalink]


and, further, on 2005-06-20 7:22:54.0, ben wolfson commented:

I was sure you were modifying a quotation to come up with that, but nope.

[permalink]


and, further, on 2005-06-20 7:27:41.0, Joe Drymala commented:

A writer doing a piece on financial piracy couldn't ask for a better name for his antagonist than Wolfson.

Except for, maybe, Blackbeard.

[permalink]


and, further, on 2005-06-21 18:11:09.0, text commented:

what about: Rex Whitecollar? I. M. Bezzle? Johnny Enron?

sorry.

[permalink]