Ad astra er as era
(15:19:57) Adam Kotsko: I think that if you were creative enough, you could tailor your vocabulary accordingly.
(15:19:58) rumjuggler: you kmow what I mean
(15:20:04) rumjuggler: maybe
(15:20:21) rumjuggler: feet are sad
(15:20:30) rumjuggler: create a new draw!
(15:21:09) rumjuggler: drat! Few are the new rats. Fear the new taxes.
(15:21:16) Adam Kotsko: Awesome.
(15:21:25) Adam Kotsko: This is a blog post begging to be written.
(15:21:48) rumjuggler: bread is the very faddish grater
But what's there as a means, that creates a sentence-starter, as S V? Verbs are there, as are names, etc, but where are, eg, "he", "she" as the sayer?---We, as sayers. Negaters, they are absent, but "but". What a hardship! Contiguity is the only way to extend reach to the other side; one wants to start in the same side, though.
Comments
on 2005-10-16 15:47:44.0, dave zacuto commented:
The DNA is not obvious
and, further, on 2005-10-16 17:58:55.0, bitchphd commented:
"kmow"?
I am appalled. Shocked and appalled.
and, further, on 2005-10-16 18:03:22.0, ben wolfson commented:
I'm typing with one hand, non-dominant—gimme a break, here.
and, further, on 2005-10-16 21:04:43.0, Matt Weiner commented:
each negater but "but" absent? never!
and, further, on 2005-10-16 21:27:23.0, ben wolfson commented:
Drat! What a retard was he that rated "never" as never a negater! As what treats he the term, then?—Maybe he had never a "never"-dawn; that dawn necessary an any treatment whatever be: the term never ready at hand, he never treats the term even as negater-ready.
Feh!
and, further, on 2005-10-16 22:39:02.0, rone commented:
I charge you with a holy quest: a lipogram.
and, further, on 2005-10-16 22:44:07.0, ben wolfson commented:
You mean another one, right?
and, further, on 2005-10-17 12:37:31.0, Michael commented:
Kampan’yō-isu no ryōkin wa tokubetsu ni ikura desu ka?
and, further, on 2005-10-18 8:56:40.0, Matt Weiner commented:
Michael, that was even more awesome than I realized at first.
and, further, on 2005-10-18 9:34:10.0, ben wolfson commented:
Can someone explain?
and, further, on 2005-10-18 9:37:41.0, Matt Weiner commented:
It's from L'Heure Bleue in Amphigorey Also; Googling (without the thingummies on the 'o's) will get you the whole English text, not that that will help.
And since this does not have any connection to Li Po (being in Japanese, duh), this means that you came up with the "Li Po Gram" yourself. That is also awesome. Awesomeness all round!
and, further, on 2005-10-18 9:38:12.0, Matt Weiner commented:
The thingummies are macrons?
and, further, on 2005-10-18 9:53:24.0, ben wolfson commented:
Yeah, macrons.
and, further, on 2005-10-18 9:56:46.0, Matt Weiner commented:
That's one of those words I shouldn't make you type right now, isn't it? Like 'paleography'.
and, further, on 2005-10-18 10:10:35.0, ben wolfson commented:
Yeah, fuck you.
and, further, on 2005-10-24 9:53:23.0, Matt Weiner commented:
Hey Ben, check this out.
and, further, on 2005-10-24 10:04:28.0, ben wolfson commented:
"g odoreida", Weiner?
and, further, on 2005-10-24 10:31:57.0, Matt Weiner commented:
Sure (I've decided that, since it seems unlikely that I will want to start a Blog Of Indiscretion, there's no reason for me to keep my blogger ID completely secure.)
and, further, on 2005-11-25 13:25:34.0, Standpipe Bridgeplate commented:
It took me a month to get the post title. A new record!
Matt might be interested to know it was this song (lyrics) what jogged my thinker.
and, further, on 2005-11-25 15:36:47.0, Matt Weiner commented:
Does the post title mean anything as it stands?
and, further, on 2005-11-25 15:58:32.0, ben wolfson commented:
Not to my knowledge.